18 November 2006

My new bright toy

digislave1

Soon after I bought my Olympus E-500 last December, I started searching for a light set-up for close-up photography, especially for outdoor use. For a while, I experimented with various combinations of LED lights attached on flexible arms to the camera body. But, they were either not bright enough or difficult to position properly. The built-in flash of the camera works fine up to a certain magnification after which the shadow of the lens is cast upon the subject. Also, flash light frequently creates harsh shadows.

digislave2
Mini L Ring fits into the palm of your hand.

So when I saw this device in B&H Photo-Video's catalog about a week ago, I realized it was just what I had in mind. It arrived in yesterday's mail and I have been testing it since then.

Digi-Slave Mini L Ring Ultra contains 24 bright LED lights. It screws into the front of the lens. This model is for lenses with 52 mm threads. (There is another and more expensive model for cameras with larger threads.) A small dial is used to adjust the light intensity, although for most applications when the camera is hand-held, the highest intensity seems to be necessary to avoid using too slow a shutter speed.

Mini L Ring runs on either a 9V battery or a 9V DC wall transformer. The interesting thing was that the B&H catalog gave me the impression that a wall transformer was not supplied with this model and the instructions that came with the unit stated that a wall transformer was available for purchase from the company. Yet, there was one inside the box. The transformer is very useful if you, like me, do a lot of indoor macrophotography of specimens.

The light intensity of Mini L Ring is bright enough to be used as the sole light source in the absence of other lights. I especially tested for that, because I frequently go out at nite to photographs snails and slugs. The picture of the Anguispira fergusoni shell (diameter: 8.5 mm) below was taken with Mini L Ring in an otherwise dark room with a shutter speed of 1/80 s at f8 and at an ISO of 320. You will notice that there is an overexposed ring surrounding the shell in the middle. This is probably an unavoidable result of using a ring light relatively close to the subject. Once the picture is cropped, sharpened and its contrast increased slightly, however, it looks fine and evenly illuminated (second picture).

digianguispira

digianguispira2

The biggest problem in using LED lights for photography is that they tend to cast a bluish hue. My camera's auto white balance setting cannot correct for that. I did a series of test shots while manually changing the color temperature setting of my E-500. I determined that the most correct color hues are obtained when the color temperature is set at about 9000 K. That was the color temperature setting I used for the shot of Anguispira fergusoni and made no subsequent color corrections. Outdoors, however, depending on the intensity of sunlight, a lower color temperature setting may be necessary (see the pictures below).

The part of the unit that sticks out in front of the lens is 27.8 mm thick, but it still leaves room to approach the subject close enough to establish focus at the highest (1:1) magnification of my Zuiko Digital 35 mm macro lens. I photographed the lens cap at 1:1 magnification (camera was handheld at 1/60 s, f6.3, ISO 400). The uneveness of the light intensity is more obvious (it gets brighter towards the edges), but I think the result would be acceptable for most purposes.

digiolympus

There are a few other drawbacks of Mini L Ring. At low magnifications the unit may slightly vignette the edges of the frame. And in certain configurations, especially outdoors, the battery compartment may get in the way and prevent one from bringing the lens close enough to the subject.

Those are, however, insignificant concerns. Once you figure out the correct white balance setting, this is a very useful light source for macrophotography.

Digi-Slave Mini L Ring Ultra is manufactured by the SR Inc.

vertigoaphid
I photographed the tiny Vertigo pygmaea dormant on a rock and the tiny aphid on a dead milkweed seed pod in my backyard this afternoon under an overcast sky using Mini L Ring as a fill-in light source. Both subjects were slightly underexposed, but that could have been avoided. The white balance was set at 9000 K for the aphid picture and at 8200 K for the Vertigo picture. No subsequent color corrections were made.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Congratulations on your new toy! As the images attest, this new toy helps you make nice images. There is a slight problem with using ring type flashes at very close distances: you lose depth perception since there are no shadows! Hope this new toy allows you to reduce (or turn off) left/right or top/bottom halves/quarters of LED's to getter better detail. Enjoy it.

AYDIN ÖRSTAN said...

The company has another model that allows one to turn one half of the lights off according to their description of it. I thought I could achieve the same effect by putting a tape over a fraction of the lights.

Mikko said...

That looks interesting. Are the LED ligts on continuously?

There's a publication about photographing biological specimens on GBIF's site: http://circa.gbif.net/Public/irc/enbi/comm/library?l=/enbi_reports/biological_specimens&vm=detailed&sb=Title (Digital Imaging of Biological Type Specimens).

Especially chapter 16 would be applicable to molluscs also; it gives advice on photographing 3D and glossy objects. (Not that your photos aren't already good :)

AYDIN ÖRSTAN said...

Yes, the lights are on continuously (this is not a flash).

Thanks for the link. I have to read those chapters.

bev said...

That looks like a nice auxiliary light for macro work. The ability to adjust the light intensity sounds particularly useful. I occasionally use a Nikon SL-1 LED ring with my Nikon CP4500 for doing macros indoors and in the field. For example, I have used it quite a lot for shooting night flying moths that gather around the porch lamp and it works well for that. The ring has just has 8 LED bulbs, but sometimes even that number seems a little too bright. Later on, I'd be interested in hearing how the 9 volt batteries hold up in that light ring. The SL-1 has 2 x CR2 3V lithium batteries which are supposed to have a very long life. Unfortunately, that does not appear to be the case (quite disappointing as they are expensive and I don't like using disposable batteries). Regarding the battery compartment getting in the way of shooting, is it possible to turn the LED ring to one side or above the lens? I regularly do that with the CP4500 and LED lamp when I'm shooting very close to the ground ( for lichen, snails, springtails, etc..). It does leave it slightly loose, but I'm just careful about not bumping it into anything.

AYDIN ÖRSTAN said...

Bev, yes, you can turn the ring up to about a quarter of a turn to move it out of the way. If you turn more, it starts to get too loose.

Of couse, one can remove it from the camera & use it as a handheld light source from the side to create shadow effects.

Roger B. said...

Interesting. How does the price compare to flash units?

AYDIN ÖRSTAN said...

Cheaper.

Markus said...

Good JoB! :)